Decision 01 - Construction-phase power profile
How will load build, month by month, across your construction programme? Design to the average and you'll oversize early and undersize later.
The argument
Get them right and you protect schedule, hold your capex, and give your client an ESG strategy that scores. Get them wrong and you carry redesign risk into execution, where it costs more to fix and less to hide.
The EPCs winning African resource projects are designing power flexibility in from concept. Not as a procurement line item. As a design discipline.
How will load build, month by month, across your construction programme? Design to the average and you'll oversize early and undersize later.
Are you treating temporary and permanent power as one continuous design, or two separate problems? Bridge architecture is where most redesign risk lives.
What's your fuel plan for the remote phases of construction, and who carries the risk if supply is disrupted? Volatility belongs in the architecture, not the procurement conversation.
Can your power design evidence its emissions profile to your client's lenders and board? Scrutiny now runs back to construction-phase power.
What's inside
A short, high-density read for the people making early power decisions on African resource projects. Sourced, cited, and structured for the way engineering teams read.
Who this is for
If you're bidding an African mining or oil and gas project where power is a material risk, and you want to engineer that risk down before award, this paper is for you.